![]() ![]() ![]() This is the default “DxO Standard” preset. When I saw the picture in DPL first, I immediately wondered what the camera had done as I had so far never seen the a1 render a face like that. In this case, it was DPL rendering that made me react at first as her face just looks weird in DPL (especially on a big window on my monitor). Imagine Edge in Edit mode (not identical, but very close to the jpg as expected).LR Classic in Develop mode (library view uses embedded jpg).I’m confused… but then I was never a bright spark. My monitor isn’t perfect, but it has 100% sRGB coverage and is calibrated (to the best of my ability) - though this is not relevant to the issue at hand.Įdit: Just did a test and the processed images, carrying over the skin tones and reddish brown greens of foliage persist into the processed image and those reds are now also reflected in other viewers - unlike the unprocessed RAW which is redder in DxO and not other viewers. I’d even be happy with the Jpegs because Olympus Jpegs are very impressive but if I have to bump the ISO, which isn’t uncommon for M43 and my “meh” lenses, I need Prime for the RAWs instead. This isn’t a massive problem but it is kind of irritating. It seems this is the only channel that is affected. I always have to counter this by desaturating Red tones and bumping the brightness to compensate (or even using different camera body rendering) - even if the RAW white balance and temp is seemingly ideal. I don’t know if it is just Olympus RAW files or I’m doing something massively wrong (I am still rather newb at this), but greens in foliage and trees will be fine in JPEG (and RAW in other viewers) but DxO renders them as a darker greenish brown which shows in the preview and is of course also present when processed. Not only is that an issue, but I’ve also noticed the same things with trees. All of these redder colours persist through processing. I understand RAW captures a lot more data, but I don’t expect the reds and skin tones to be as reddish as it is… it’s not severe and the images are usable, but it’s not ideal and it’s different to how they were when shot in reality. I believe some alternative image viewers respect ICC profiles as well yet across them the Jpeg and RAW look identical in colour even to the likes of MS Photos,, Affinity Photo and FastStone. If I view the JPEG and RAW files in any other viewer, except DxO’s own, the colours are identical and they look good - skin looks realistically colourful. Just to note: I purposely set RGB images to have No Correction on Import and DxO Standard for RAW. Now I know the camera will apply processing to Jpeg images when captured, so compared to RAW the brightness/contrast and colours may seem more favourable initially, but the issue is that while everything looks great with the JPEGs, the RAW files are not as they should be. The issue I am facing is colour reproduction of RAW ORF files relative to other viewers compared to DxO and its processing. I’m hoping somebody can give me some advice. Okay, so I’ve had a bit of an issue for a while now (and do note I am still using an old version of DxO - 2.4. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |