![]() ![]() According to Gardner Friscia, IATSE Local 74 president, they will return to picket in a few weeks, and keep doing so until the College Street stagehands get their contract.Ĭollege Street Music Hall opened up in 2015, 13 years after the closure of the same facility that once operated as the Palace Theater under different management. Multiple members of IATSE Local 74 –– the southern Connecticut division of a labor union that represents, trains, employs and protects performance venue employees –– emphasized that they mainly hoped to “get the word out” and gain public support through the picket. The pandemic exacerbated the risks of no health insurance in particular, and has left stagehands almost entirely without work. For the last nine months, the union has been in a stalled negotiation with College Street Music Hall management, which continues to refuse to negotiate a contract that would allow its employees to access benefits from the union. On March 11, 2020, frustrated by the lack of health benefits, retirement benefits, overtime, hourly wage system and overall substandard conditions and support, stagehands at College Street Music Hall joined the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees Local 74. ![]() They stood in small circles, chatting with an energy that did not match the fatigue they said they felt standing there all day. I noticed them as I walked home in their last hour of picketing in the late Friday afternoon sun. to 5 p.m., they stood, intercepted every so often by curious pedestrians and very often by honks of supportive drivers. A group of roughly a dozen stagehands picketed along the rainbow sidewalk in front of the building, with signs draped over their bodies that read “NO HEALTH CARE NO RETIREMENT NO FUTURE.” Monday to Friday last week, from 9 a.m. This small point of contrast between the two theaters’ exteriors makes some sense given that College Street Music Hall is not taking care of its stagehands in the way that its neighbor and many other Connecticut venues do. But looking across the street, you notice parallel the COVID-19 signage at the Shubert Theater –– two glass-encased, glossy posters that say “The Show Must Go On! But for now, we will take a brief intermission…” Maybe, it seems, the College Street Music Hall is struggling to follow its own message. It exudes a carelessness we might expect from an establishment neglected by the public as live performance gatherings are incompatible with public health. As a passerby, the discombobulation of the well-meaning message is sort of funny, and sort of sad. This analysis could help to determine whether rhythm-keeping activity is inactivated by an interruptive event during periodic motor activity.Ĭentral pattern generator Deletion Reset Stepping Two-level half-center model.“S TA YSAFE & H EALTHY / SE EY OUS O ON” read the black letters (with some effort) arrayed on the white strip that overhangs the entrance to College Street Music Hall. ![]() Those findings indicate that step rhythm is reset after brief intermission of stepping, and contradict with the hypothesis that the activity of the rhythm generator is maintained, while the pattern generator is temporally inactive during a brief intermission of periodic motor output. The actual side of the first step after the intermission was consistent with the predicted first step side at a 0.5 probability. In the stop session, the step immediately after the intermission of stepping appeared at random time regardless of the step rhythm before the intermission in most participants. This finding indicates that postural perturbation does not interfere the rhythm-keeping activity. In the non-stop session, the second step after the platform translation appeared at the integer multiple of the pre-existing step period in most participants, indicating that step rhythm was not reset. They continued stepping after the platform translation (non-stop session) or stopped briefly after the translation before resuming step with their own timing (stop session). Healthy participants stepped on a platform that could translate forward or backward. This observation reflects an intermission of rhythm-keeping activity. A reset of the step rhythm was defined as an observation that the step re-emerges at random timing after an interruptive event regardless of the step rhythm before the interruption. This investigation was made through testing whether the step rhythm was reset after an interruptive event. In the present study, we tested a hypothesis that the rhythm generator in humans keeps the rhythm of periodic motor output during brief inactivation of the pattern generator. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |